War must be last resort to settle disputes: Chinese General on Doklam

China and India are both neighbours and competitors, but not all competitors must be treated in the toughest way: Chinese Major General

Doklam standoff, Doklam, Sikkim Standoff, Line of Actual Control, LAC, Doklam bowl, Indian Army, India, China, Bhutan
IANS Beijing
Last Updated : Sep 13 2017 | 6:34 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The settlement of the border row between India and China was "the best result possible", a Chinese military strategist has said.

"The reason why so many Chinese people paid attention to the China-India border standoff in the Doklam area is that they are unfamiliar with China's strategic positioning," said Qiao Liang, a Major General in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and a military strategist.

"If they had a clear understanding of China's strategic positioning, they would know that the settlement of the Doklam stand-off was one of the best results possible.

"China and India are both neighbours and competitors, but not all competitors must be treated in the toughest way," he said.

Indian and Chinese troops were locked in a tense border stand-off for over two months on the Doklam border, seriously straining their relations.

Amid repeated PLA threats to oust the Indian soldiers from Doklam, claimed by both Bhutan and China, New Delhi and Beijing withdrew their troops late last month following diplomatic negotiations.

Indian troops entered Doklam area to stop Chinese soldiers from building a road which New Delhi said would affect its strategic interests.

"Many people would say that the road construction in China's territory was none of India's business. Is this belief right?" the author wrote in state-run Global Times late on Tuesday.

"It is reasonable to some extent because road construction in this area is not a matter of right and wrong, but we need to understand that it is not always right to do something right at any time. Only doing the right thing at the right time is correct.

"So, with this principle in mind, one can understand that the Doklam confrontation was solved in the way it should have been. And the most important thing is that when you understand China's strategic positioning and you cannot bring the entire world under your domination, you are willing to leave well enough alone."

The author added: "Resorting to war is irresponsible for the country and the country's future as war has always been the last resort to solve problems. Whenever there may be a way to solve a conflict without war, war should be avoided."

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 13 2017 | 6:34 PM IST

Next Story