Women tennis players as consistent as men

Image
IANS New York
Last Updated : Aug 10 2015 | 1:57 PM IST

Challenging current assumptions, a new research suggests that female tennis players are no less consistent than their male counterparts.

The apparent inconsistency among women players is due to the match format - best of three or five sets - not gender, the findings showed.

"The results suggest that differences in consistency between the women's and men's tours are not due to gender, but rather to differences in the format of matches men and women play at the Grand Slam events--Wimbledon and the Australian, French and U.S. Opens," explained researcher Stephanie Kovalchik, associate statistician with the RAND Corporation, a US-based research organisation.

For her analysis, Kovalchik developed a series of measures of consistency and applied those to performance data for singles match-play on the Women's Tennis Association (WTA) and Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) tours for the 2010 through 2014 seasons.

Of all the measures of consistency Kovalchik examined, half showed no gender differences in performance while the other half suggested female players have had less consistent performances in the seasons considered.

However, these differences were observed only at Grand Slam tournaments, where women play a different match format than males--women play a best-of-three format, where the winner is the first to win two sets; men play a best-of-five, where the winner is the first to win three sets.

Kovalchik examined whether match format could explain the observed tour differences in consistency.

Logic suggests a best-of-five format favours higher-ranked players more than a best-of-three, since it is harder for an underdog to win three sets against a better player than two sets.

Using a mathematical analysis, she quantified the edge a best-of-five format provides.

This calculation revealed that the theoretical win advantage for the higher ranked player in a best-of-five match is seven to 10 percentage points.

The findings were presented at the 2015 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM 2015) in Seattle, US.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 10 2015 | 1:46 PM IST

Next Story