Attacking Parliament is ok?

Explore Business Standard

| The culprit has had a fair hearing at different levels of the judicial system, his death sentence has been confirmed by the Supreme Court, and no one can argue that the crime was not the most serious imaginable. If he is to be spared the extreme punishment, then the country should decide whether it wants a death sentence at all""and there are many who hold the principled position that it should be abolished. But so long as it exists, does this case merit an exception being made? |
| India has seen one effect of leniency in the past. The NDA government had to release Maulana Masood Azhar following the Kandahar hijack of an Indian Airlines plane, and the Jaish-e-Mohammad, which Azhar founded, after his release is supposed to have masterminded a series of terror attacks on the country, including the one on Parliament. Giving Afzal Guru life imprisonment allows for this possibility to be repeated at some date in the future. There is little doubt that Afzal Guru's hanging could have been timed better""no one can deny that hanging a Muslim on a Friday in the month of Ramzan, shortly before Id, is not a smart thing to do but that is not a date set by the government. What is most unfortunate in this whole episode is that the Congress does not think it worthwhile to make a clear statement of the party's position on the case, especially after the stand taken by its chief minister in Jammu & Kashmir. |
First Published: Oct 10 2006 | 12:00 AM IST