The government's strategy of increasing duty, even while oil marketing companies effect moderate price cuts, reflects a mature and prudent response to the decline in international crude oil prices. India imports crude oil in large quantities to meet almost 80 per cent of its total domestic demand. Passing on the entire benefit of the fall in crude oil prices to the oil refining companies or the consumers would count as poor policy, unmindful of the basic principles of taxing scarce non-renewable resources like petroleum products. The logic of higher duty gets stronger in a situation when crude oil prices are steadily moving in a southward direction and the country's dependence on imported crude oil continues to rise. Thus, the government deserves to be complimented on the correctness of its response - undeterred as it has been by populist demands for ushering in the promised good days through lower prices. The extra revenue mobilised through the duty increases will hopefully be used for productive purposes like helping the government ramp up its capital expenditure. The only discordant note comes from hints that the excise duty may be reduced if crude oil prices start rising. This would only be warranted in order to smooth out runaway inflation in the case of short, sharp increases in international crude oil prices. The promise of such duty cuts needlessly raises expectations that would later need to be managed.
Another oil sector development that shows the government's firm commitment to subsidies reform is its decision to roll out the direct benefits transfer scheme for payment of subsidy to consumers of kerosene in 26 districts across eight states from April 1, 2016. This is expected to curtail the government's subsidy bill on kerosene, which was estimated at Rs 24,800 crore in 2014-15. In a bid to get more states to persuade kerosene users to join the scheme, the Centre has agreed to share as much as three-fourths of its subsidy savings on kerosene with the states in the first two years. The sharing formula would be reduced gradually in the subsequent years. But this is a commendable start to prevent diversion and misuse of the fuel - and in the process ensure better targeting of subsidies.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
