Horoscopes are incredibly popular, quite literally unbelievably so. Financial and political predictions should be treated the same. Forecasts are usually either wild guesses or extrapolations of past trends.
In a series of experiments, behavioural economists have collected convincing evidence pointing to the human tendency to believe that patterns of the past will prevail in future. We think we are looking ahead, but in fact we are staring into history. The same fallacy is hard-wired into state-of-the-art models used to forecast economic growth. Moreover, they assume that any genuine, exogenous shock - be it a drop in oil prices or the bursting of a property bubble - will only have a short-term impact. It is assumed that economies will digest disruptions quickly and revert to long term trends. This would be fine if we lived in a mechanistic, predetermined world where the relevant probability distributions were known beforehand.
But unexpected events - occurrences that Nassim Nicholas Taleb famously dubbed “black swans” - are neither predetermined nor predictable.
Just think of the three most important events of the past 25 years: the fall of the Berlin Wall, 9/11 and the financial meltdown. They were huge surprises which have had a fundamental and long lasting impact on political, social and financial affairs.
If they had been anticipated, meanwhile, they might not have happened because economic and political agents would have adjusted their behaviour in advance.
Even trends that are visible, well in advance, present headaches. The mobile internet is a case in point. At the turn of the century, experts more or less accurately predicted a rapid rise in wireless communications.
Yet, still, telecom companies spent too much on 3G licences and the technology took much longer to take off than was expected. And outfits such as Apple, Google and Facebook - companies one step removed from the golden ether - have drawn the largest tranches of benefit.
There is nothing wrong with making predictions. Indeed, if you refuse to look into the future you will almost certainly be less well able to cope with present dangers.
Like horoscopes, predictions are also entertaining. Ultimately, however, they are akin to a chocolate fire guard. Enticing but, well, a bit rubbish.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
