There are many reasons why the proposal to list LIC is a good one. If public sector banks can be listed on stock exchanges, there is no reason why LIC should not be widely owned. In fact, LIC listing will serve multiple purposes. Apart from unlocking value, it will not only allow investors, both retail and institutional, to own the largest insurance company but will also improve transparency and governance in the company, which will make it more efficient.
But addressing pending issues and listing in a single year is a challenging task. For instance, the merger and listing of general insurance companies have not happened yet. LIC will have added complications, including amending the law governing the insurance behemoth. It is a large company, and will possibly become the most valuable firm by market capitalisation in India. Therefore, the process of valuation and adjustments in books, if necessary, will take time. LIC also has huge investments in real estate, art, and the equity market, which may prove to be time-consuming for valuation purposes. Market conditions will also need to be properly assessed, as even a 5 per cent stake sale would make it by far the biggest public offer in the country as it is the largest company in terms of assets under management. The government can then progressively trim its stake in the coming years. It will also have to deal with employee unions and political opposition, but that should not be a problem.
It is thus important to move forward on LIC with careful planning. One of the biggest reasons why the government mostly fails to attain the disinvestment target is poor planning. The target normally depends on the need of the Budget, companies are often randomly selected, and the government waits until towards the end of the year to sell its stake. This is exactly why it failed to achieve the budgeted target in the current year also. The need is to start work on LIC’s listing early. Since tax revenue projection has factored in a significant jump in buoyancy, which may not materialise, and it is difficult to cut revenue expenditure, a failure on the disinvestment front will directly affect the capital expenditure of the government, which, in turn, will have a direct bearing on potential growth.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)