Two questions provide clues to the Centre’s intent: Why is the delimitation process felt to be necessary before the J&K Assembly elections? And, why is statehood being pushed to after the Assembly elections?
The notification for a delimitation exercise for J&K, Assam, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland was done on March 20, 2020. It was to be carried out by the Delimitation Commission chaired by Justice (Retd) Ranjana Prakash Desai. However, in March 2021, the Centre took the four northeastern states out of mandate of the Delimitation Commission. The Assam state Assembly elections were held on March 27, 2021 without delimitation. Presumably, the delimitation in the northeastern states will now be held with the rest of the country in 2026 based on the 2021 Census.
Then why is delimitation in J&K being proposed much before it takes place in the rest of the country, and relying on outdated figures from the 2011 Census? The J&K Reorganisation Act, which led to the bifurcation of the erstwhile state, provided for seven extra constituencies for the Union Territory of J&K. If the reorganisation of the UT is to be completed, the new constituencies will have to be demarcated now. But should they be defined on population data more than 10 years old? There are other concerns too about the delimitation exercise.
As of now, of the 83 Assembly constituencies that go to polls, 46 are in the Kashmir Valley and 37 in Jammu (24 seats are reserved for Pakistan Occupied Kashmir). The apprehension among the Kashmiris is that delimitation is being done to add seven extra seats to the Jammu region. Prima facie, the 2011 Census figures do not seem to support a reallocation that entirely favours Jammu. Yet, the Kashmiris fear such a manipulation, given the Centre’s deceptive behaviour in the run-up to the August 5, 2019, decision to strike down statehood, remove its special status and bifurcate it.
The non-BJP parties in J&K are unlikely to compromise on the issue of statehood before elections. In the all-party meeting with the prime minister, at least two leaders – Farooq Abdullah of the National Conference and Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress party – put their foot down and argued that statehood would have to be restored before elections. Kashmiri leaders feel that holding Assembly elections while J&K remains a UT may eventually lead to a truncated statehood like that of Delhi – where the elected executive is maimed. Ghulam Nabi Azad made these fears clear by telling the prime minister that none of the parties wanted an “LG State” (i.e. a state run by the Lieutenant Governor) in J&K.
A statehood like Delhi’s would mean that framing any legislation on land, public order and police would remain with the Centre. Further, all executive actions initiated by the Cabinet or ministers would need the approval of the Lieutenant Governor. This truncation of elected power was achieved in Delhi through an amendment to the Greater National Capital Territory of Delhi Act; in J&K it could be achieved by amending the J&K Reorganisation Act of 2019.
A truncated statehood will not be acceptable to most of the mainstream political parties, especially the five-party Peoples’ Alliance for Gupkar Declaration. The proposal’s acceptance by a couple of smaller and pliable parties will not pass international muster as a milestone in the road map for restoring the political process in J&K.
The optics and the packaging of the Centre’s move on J&K is very much aimed at an international audience. If the ground situation were indeed normal and suited to revive the political process, then the Amarnath Yatra would not have been cancelled for a third year running. Nor would political prisoners remain jailed, media harassed, and security presence heavy in the cities, towns and villages of the Kashmir Valley.
The participants in the meeting were aware that the proposed electoral exercise was not for their benefit. One of them pointed this out to the prime minister, observing that as a “frontier state” the situation in J&K was being shaped by developments in Afghanistan, the tension with Pakistan, and the border incursions by China.
If the BJP government in Delhi only wants to gain greater regional and international manoeuvrability by claiming forward political movement in J&K, there is no reason why the Kashmiri political parties should oblige by cheerleading its moves. If the National Conference, the Peoples’ Democratic Party and the Congress refuse to contest elections to a UT Assembly, the exercise will lack credibility, and point to a failure of the Centre’s dialogue process. It will not help the Centre to refurbish its image in the eyes of the world or help stabilise ties with Pakistan.
The demand for restoration of statehood before elections is likely to have popular support both in Jammu and in the Kashmir Valley. Even if it does not resolve long-standing political issues, at least people would be freed from the clutches of an unaccountable bureaucracy. Statehood would also give them an effective platform to negotiate power sharing with the Centre. Their agenda for greater political, cultural and social autonomy within the Indian Union can be pursued thereafter in a constitutional way. Those with a separatist ideology and favouring militant methods will stay out of it but political parties committed to staying within the Indian Union will be persuaded to put their weight behind pulling J&K out of the morass in which it finds itself.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
