On the face of it, the sharp decline in the current account deficit to 3.6 per cent of GDP, from 6.7 per cent in the previous quarter, clearly comes as a significant relief in the battle against a rapidly declining currency. Most observers see the large current account deficit as a major factor behind both the magnitude and the pace of the rupee's decline. Consequently, its narrowing must have positive implications for the currency. However, it must also be remembered that this is an accounting of what happened three months ago. Compared to what has happened in the first quarter (April-June) of 2013-14, that period was one of relative calm. While exports grew by almost six per cent during January-March, the early indications from April-June are that even this rate is not sustaining. Further, with the extent of rupee depreciation during this quarter, the rupee value of imports will undoubtedly increase for some time at least. Overall, then, while the 6.7 per cent recorded in the third quarter of last year was something of an aberration, the 3.6 per cent seen in the fourth quarter may also be well below the sustainable level. The government simply cannot afford to lose sight of the structural adjustments necessary to reduce this vulnerability.
Going beyond the good news on the deficit, however, the external debt report, also published yesterday, highlights the dangers of financing a large deficit by increasing recourse to debt flows. By March 2013, outstanding external debt grew by almost 13 per cent over March 2012 to reach $390 billion. Of greater concern is the fact that effective short-term debt - or debt with residual maturity of less than one year - comprises 44 per cent of the total. As a proportion of foreign exchange reserves, it is close to 60 per cent. These are clearly pointers to rising vulnerability. Any shock - global or domestic - could trigger a rapid outflow or refusal to roll over, thereby exacerbating the pressure on an already stressed currency. Although it's tempting for the government to encourage further debt inflows by easing remaining restrictions, it must also remember that this comes at the price of increasing overall vulnerability. This may ultimately be self-defeating from the viewpoint of stabilising the rupee. Here again, while admitting that there are short-term compulsions, the only solution is to shift the balance of capital inflows to direct investment. That, of course, means improving the investment climate, which is really the core problem.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
