From the barest details of the case which are known, it appears that Epic Systems, the largest US proprietary software provider for the management of health information systems, has accused TCS of unauthorised downloads of proprietary data while implementing the Epic Systems solution for a customer. It has provided a motive for this: TCS has accessed the data in order to enhance its own health information management system product which is in competition with Epic Systems'. One would expect well-defined firewalls between proprietary data accessed to service a client and a service provider's own data. R Chandrashekhar, the president of the software lobby group Nasscom, has said that while in a software product the source code is proprietary, the user code or manual given with a product is not. He has added that members of the jury, who are non-technical people, may not grasp such distinctions. This raises the question as to whether the lawyers arguing for TCS did the best job they could in explaining such distinctions to laymen on the jury.
Read more from our special coverage on "TCS"
Questions will inevitably be asked about the level of protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in India, and it will be averred that TCS is part of a lax culture. But it is difficult to see TCS cutting IPR corners for regular business gain. It has, in fact, categorically declared that it "did not derive any benefit from downloaded documents". It is possible that though its motives were above board, it was lax in interpreting the law and deciding how far it could go in using vendor information for its own proprietary work. There may be a parallel here with Infosys having to pay a fine for infringement of US visa and immigration rules, which was a case of administrative laxity and not conscious misconduct to gain business advantage.