How does reporting KAM help enhance the understanding of financial statements? Does it reflect the auditor’s concerns in financial statements?
Will companies have to report their numbers differently?
KAM will not change the manner in which numbers are reported. However, in some cases, companies may provide enhanced disclosures in their financial statements relating to matters that are reported as KAM.
How has been the experience of other countries in this regard?
The UK, the Netherlands, Australia and other countries have already seen reporting using the new format. The reaction of the stakeholders in these countries has been quite positive. Under KAM, auditors have reported on areas such as impairment, going concern, loss provisions, related party transactions, revenue recognition and income taxes, depending on the nature of the entity’s business environment. This has assisted users to better engage with companies in these areas.
What role do the board and the management play in KAM reporting?
Successful implementation of KAM is a shared responsibility between the management, the audit committee and auditors. Management and audit committees would need to engage with their auditors and agree on the matters to be reported as KAM. This would, in turn, result in senior management and audit committees enhancing their focus on financial reporting complexities, judgments and disclosures relating to such KAM. Board of directors, management and others responsible for preparing financial statements will also need to consider the implications of such enhanced communication on various users of financial statements. For example, management may need to proactively communicate with investors to assure them that KAM are different from ‘emphasis of matters’, which have historically been viewed as a tool for auditors to highlight uncertainties relating to the reported numbers. Similarly, management should be prepared to engage with investors to address questions around the assumptions made and judgment exercised in these areas and related sensitivities to the reported numbers.
Will reporting of KAM help reduce misstatements and improve the overall trust in financial statements?
The interactions between the auditor and the audit committee are a key element for enhancing the quality of financial reporting, as well as the quality of the audit. Reporting of KAM requires a candid two-way dialogue between the auditor and the audit committee about the risks of misreporting and how these risks have been addressed. To that extent, KAM reporting is likely to improve overall audit quality. Further, the enhanced communication in the audit report will provide the users with a basis to engage further with the management about important matters relating to the financial statements. Overall, if implemented correctly, KAM reporting can assist in building a greater trust in the financial statements and the audit process.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)