Letter to BS: Nationalisation opened up avenues for large-scale employment

Only after the nationalisation did "class banking" become "mass banking"

banking sector, banks
Representative Image
Business Standard
2 min read Last Updated : Jul 15 2019 | 11:19 PM IST
Kudos to Tamal Bandyopadhyay for "Celebrating 50 yrs of bank nationalisation" (July 15). It would not be appropriate to pass judgement on the efficacy of bank nationalisation based on the wisdom of hindsight. We need to look at the ground realities that existed in the late sixties and the vision with which the nationalisation of banks was unfurled. In the pre-nationalisation era, existing banks were more interested in “class banking” with the majority of the population outside the framework of banking. Only after the nationalisation did this “class banking” become “mass banking”. More branches were forced to be opened in the interiors of the country which enabled more people to have access to banking facilities.
 
Government sponsored schemes were routed through these banks' branches. The granting of credit through these government sponsored schemes to generate self-employment and income for the family was a laudable initiative. This also to a great extent freed the rural masses from being strangled by local money lenders who lent at high rates of interest. That these directed lendings later on became large-scale non-performing assets (NPAs) for the banking sector is a different story.
 
Nationalisation also opened up avenues for large-scale employment. An army of educated people found career opportunities. If these early employees in banks were drilled with a sense of responsibility and customer service, the story could have been far different. Job security was assured. Emoluments were the same for performers and laggards. With new generation banks coming in, customers had a choice and many moved their loyalties to these new entities. The steady loss of business to these newbies did not act as a wake-up call to the nationalised bank as job security and steady emoluments helped continue the lackadaisical approach.
 
With the new generation banks moving into the hinterland and judicious use of technology, the importance of nationalised banks will diminish. The government also seems to be serious in stemming the rot. One merger has happened. More are in the pipeline.
 
K V Premraj, Mumbai
Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to: 
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 
New Delhi 110 002 
Fax: (011) 23720201  ·  E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :public sector banksIndian banking sector

Next Story