Letters: Effective rate of protection

Business Standard New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 11 2013 | 9:36 PM IST
This refers to the editorial "A 1970s argument" (November 7). Those who know of the tariff rates since the 1970s, and their declining trend, cannot agree with the editorial. The argument is an old controversy between free trade and protection. The level of protection to Indian industry has not remained the same but has declined substantially. In the 1990s, the customs tariff rates were typically 85 per cent for machinery and even higher for consumer goods. The highest range of rates were nearly 500 per cent. Even the baggage rate was 250 per cent. The "collection rate" declined from 47 per cent in 1990-91 to 29 per cent in 1995-96; 23 per cent in 1998-99 to 21 per cent in 2000-01. The"median" or "mode" rate (that occurs most of the times), has come down from 70 per cent, in 1991-92 to 30 per cent in 2001-02, and just 10 per cent in 2013. We are not talking about nominal protection but the effective rate of protection (ERP) that expresses the margin of protection on value added in the production process rather than on the product price. A computation of import-weighted average ERP (Protection in Indian Manufacturing: An Empirical Study by Hasheem Nouroz) shows the following:


The latest figures are not available but judging from the low rates of import tariff, it is clear that it has gone down substantially. Now the rate of duty for machinery is just 7.5 per cent. Steel and chemicals attract 10 per cent. With exemptions, the collection rate of duty on average would be nearly 7 per cent.

So, to dismiss the plea of the Indian industry, to be circumspect about allowing free trade on many items, is not to see the reality but to remain doctrinaire. Effective protection is now practically non-existent. Pertinently, anti-dumping duty cannot be levied if the duty is made zero in a free trade agreement (FTA), which is a concern for Indian industry.

This debate should not have taken place at all. It would be advisable for the commerce ministry to consult the finance ministry and the manufacturing industry before inking an FTA. A rational approach is necessary, not a debate.

Sukumar Mukhopadhyay New Delhi

Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
New Delhi 110 002
Fax: (011) 23720201
E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 11 2013 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story