Letters: Law not to blame always

The ban on the entry of a certain category of vehicles into New Delhi was aimed at reducing pollution, not eliminating it

Image
Business Standard
Last Updated : Dec 07 2016 | 10:32 PM IST
Somasekhar Sundaresan’s article, “Failure to read the difference” (December 7), makes one think about the need for distinguishing the purpose of law — including administrative and judicial orders — and the desired outcome.

When the causes of a problem are many and the law aims at eliminating one of them, it should be judged only by the outcome about that part of the problem and not the whole. The ban on the entry of a certain category of vehicles into New Delhi was aimed at reducing pollution, not eliminating it, there being other contributory factors. The question is whether the intensity of the fog would have been more if the ban were not imposed and also whether it was implemented faithfully.

Second, a delay in implementing a punitive law defeats its purpose to serve as a deterrent for future violators. Our legal process is too slow — the Nirbhaya case is still with the Supreme Court. Moreover, crimes are committed out of ignorance about law, too. The Mumbai Shakti Mills rape case could be the result of either of the two factors or both.

Besides, when the objective of a law is laudable, protests by those opposed to it should be ignored. The Supreme Court’s decision about singing the National Anthem in cinema halls as an indicator of patriotic spirit is beyond reproach. If some people find it inconvenient to stand for a minute to sing it or see it as a fruitless exercise, it does not matter. The question is how many can recite it fully and understand its meaning.

Also, there are hardly any laws that serve their objective fully. This is because upbringing, social influences and certain personality traits foster a criminal tendency, so that laws and rules become ineffective.

The success of enactments and administrative and judicial orders also depends on their clarity and ease of understanding by society. Thus, lawmakers need to be replaced, not the laws.

 Y G Chouksey   Pune
 Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to: 
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg 
New Delhi 110 002 
Fax: (011) 23720201  ·  E-mail: letters@bsmail.in

All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 07 2016 | 10:29 PM IST

Next Story