Letters: On VAT and the FRBM Act

Image
Business Standard New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 27 2013 | 10:37 PM IST
This refers to T N Ninan's column "Nine years later..." (Weekend Ruminations, February 23). The write-up contains certain factual inaccuracies as detailed below:

The value-added tax (VAT) was not introduced during the term of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. It is the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that was able to forge a consensus on VAT, and VAT was introduced by most states with effect from April 1, 2005. The remaining states followed thereafter.

In so far as the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act is concerned, though it was passed during the term of the NDA government, it was not notified. It is the UPA government that notified the Act and made the rules with effect from July 5, 2004.

Further, the contention of the columnist that the accretions to the foreign exchange reserves were achieved by the Reserve Bank of India "often acting in the teeth of opposition from the finance minister" is baseless and wrong.
D S Malik,
ADG (M&C) Finance, New Delhi

T N Ninan replies:
It is true that VAT eventually came into being in 2005. However, what my column said was that it was "introduced" by the Vajpayee government. For this, please refer to the Budget speech of 2003, in which the then Finance Minister Jaswant Singh stated that a conference of state chief ministers, chaired by the prime minister, in October 2002 had "confirmed the final decision that all states and union territories would introduce VAT from April 2003". Singh also said in the same Budget speech: "...The coming year will be historic with the states switching over to a value added tax (VAT)... The Government of India considers the introduction of VAT, at the state level, to be a historic reform of our domestic trade tax system...".

My column said the Vajpayee government "enacted" the fiscal responsibility law.

D S Malik confirms this in saying the NDA government "passed" the Act. That it was notified later is another matter.

I was wrong in writing about opposition by the finance minister to what the Reserve Bank of India was doing. There was criticism aired in the media, including by people who were or had been in the finance ministry, but no opposition from the minister. My apologies for this error.

Letters can be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to:
The Editor, Business Standard
Nehru House, 4 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
New Delhi 110 002
Fax: (011) 23720201
E-mail: letters@bsmail.in
All letters must have a postal address and telephone number
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 27 2013 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story