This refers to the article “Vodafone ruling: A step back in investor relations” (September 13). Although it is true that any arrangement that aims at lawful tax avoidance is permissible, in the case of Vodafone it is substance rather than form of the arrangement that is the basis of the dispute between the Income Tax department and Vodafone.
The law in India is very clear on taxation of capital gains: unless otherwise exempt, all such gains would attract tax. To avoid disputes of a similar nature in the future, this is an opportunity to clearly state the unwritten law: all gains arising out of transfer of capital assets located and in use in India would be taxed. The direct taxes code (DTC) can include such a provision.
Narendra M Apte, Pune
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
