No drama

China plenum is far cry from what might have been

Image
John Foley
Last Updated : Nov 13 2013 | 11:04 PM IST
China's third plenum was a study in anti-performance. This meeting of the ruling party's top figures traditionally gives each new generation of leaders an opportunity to make big gestures. What emerged on November 12 was only promising policies wrapped up in bland talk. Yet there is an important message: big economic changes may come, but politics remains a matter for Party insiders only.

In the plenum's concluding missive, often seen as a blueprint for the next decade, every conceivable reform is mentioned, but with next to no detail. Rule of law, better property rights for peasants, better use of environmental resources and tax reform all make no more than a showing. The introduction of a special working group to oversee reform and the market's role being upgraded to "decisive" are as concrete as it gets.

It's a far cry from what might have been. There's little sign of the detail hinted at in the recent '383 Plan', a proposal from an influential think-tank that called for reforms to state-owned enterprises and the services sector.

But vagueness might be the point. After a similar plenum in 1993, party chief Jiang Zemin's fuzzy explanation of the "socialist market economy" confused many observers. Yet, under that mantra he pushed through all kinds of non-socialist changes, right up to frog-marching China into the World Trade Organisation.

What's clear is that China's ruling party has little interest in overhauling the political process. Viewers of the evening news on November 12 were treated to the usual montage of unsmiling men in suits. It couldn't be further from the "southern tour" of 1992, when Jiang Zemin's predecessor, Deng Xiaoping, theatrically hit the road to rally public support for sweeping economic reforms.

And for foreign capitalists, there's little to latch on to. No targets for investment; no promises to open up markets such as technology, banking or health care to full foreign ownership. The dominance of the "public sector" will be maintained. In fact, for all China's talk of reform, it's as if China's leaders aren't thinking of outsiders at all. That may be precisely the point.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 13 2013 | 9:32 PM IST

Next Story