Publish and be praised

Image
Antony Currie
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 1:57 AM IST

US stress tests: The Federal Reserve’s latest stress tests mark another important step in the rehabilitation of America’s banks. Several are to be allowed to increase their dividends and even resume buying back stock — JPMorgan, US Bancorp and Wells Fargo had already announced by midday on Friday that they are doing both, and Goldman Sachs later said it would buy back the $5 billion of preferred stock Warren Buffett acquired at the height of the crisis. Getting the Fed’s clearance for these moves is a welcome development. But it would be even more powerful if the Fed were to go the extra mile and provide much more detail on both its methodology and the results.

As it stands, the central bank seems to be sticking to the letter of the law. Last year’s Dodd-Frank Act stipulated that the Fed oversee such check-ups annually. But the law sketched out the barest of requirements on the economic scenarios regulators should test for and only required that the Fed publish a summary of its findings.

That’s in stark contrast to the detailed analysis published in the first stress tests at the height of the crisis two years ago. That was the deciding factor in overcoming the market’s initial skepticism about the tests. Being able to see how a variety of banks fared when subjected to the same adverse scenarios ultimately helped stabilize trading in their stocks and debt and gave investors confidence enough to pour some $200 billion of new capital into the financial sector.

Regulators need not, and should not, keep such transparency in reserve for a crisis. After all, they have far more access to information on banks' leverage, loan portfolios and lending and investing criteria than shareholders do. That means they are better positioned to spot potential excesses and lax risk management.

Revealing more about a thorough analysis of their charges once a year wouldn't just help give investors confidence that the banking system is on an even keel. It would also show the public that the regulators are on the case. After their collective failings before and during the crisis, that would be a useful boost for confidence, too.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 21 2011 | 12:57 AM IST

Next Story