Royal abdication

UK retreat from RBS is more important than value

Image
George Hay
Last Updated : Mar 08 2015 | 9:31 PM IST
Re-privatising Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) used to mean creating a world-class universal bank and selling out at a profit. The first objective has already fallen by the wayside - RBS is well on the way to becoming a UK-focused retail bank. Happily the second, judging by comments by Chancellor George Osborne on March 5, could soon follow.

Osborne acknowledges his part in calling it wrong. With hindsight the initial strategy was flawed. Back in 2010 exiting investment banking, as the bank is now effectively doing, would have been a huge call. It made more sense to back the bank's still-enormous trading outfit, which had a bumper 2009. That seemed the best way to allow RBS to be re-privatised as soon as possible above the 500 pence-per-share average in-price at which the government bought more than 80 per cent in 2008-09.

In retrospect, this was a mistake. The investment bank was hobbled by misconduct fines and a decline in bond trading that now looks structural. More broadly, the Eurozone crisis meant RBS lost even more through its Ulster Bank subsidiary.

Now that Chief Executive Ross McEwan is shrinking RBS back to its pre-casino model, there's a good argument for waiting for tangible progress. Selling out below 500 pence could reprise the wrangling that occurred after Royal Mail's flotation. Britain's selldowns of Lloyds Banking Group, from 43 per cent to 24 per cent, have taken place above the in-price.

But there's a better case for speed. The idea that Britain is an "arm's-length" shareholder is a fiction: the government has repeatedly interfered with pay and governance. That has made transforming the bank into a focused, profitable institution much harder. In other states, like Spain, the emphasis has rightly been on incentives or deadlines to return banks to the private sector.

Whoever wins the election should aim to start re-privatising RBS as soon as possible - perhaps 2016, when analysts expect the bank to resume dividends. As the bank escapes from the state's headlock and RBS restructures, the shares should rise anyway. A staggered selldown could eventually deliver taxpayers a profit.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 08 2015 | 9:31 PM IST

Next Story