Schadenfraude

Image
Nicholas Paisner
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 12:31 PM IST

Goldman fallout: Goldman Sachs' competitors may have initially relished last week's shock news of civil fraud charges against the firm. But shareholders in investment banks don't see any reason for cheer. They are rightly concerned that regulators will be trawling through the records of any bank involved in the collateralised debt business during the boom. Shares in investment banks have fallen around 5 percent since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said it was probing an infamous Goldman CDO trade on Friday.

That may seem like an overreaction. The SEC has already been investigating the CDO space for some time; there is no official suggestion that other firms did anything wrong. Moreover, the accusations against Goldman relate to just one specific transaction.

But the CDO backlash appears to be building a head of steam. The UK and German governments have called for an inquiry into Goldman's Abacus transaction, which saddled their taxpayers with large losses. Rabobank has used the Goldman case to reinvigorate a claim against Merrill Lynch. The Dutch lender has accused the U.S. investment bank of failing to disclose fully the role of hedge fund Magnetar in structuring a CDO it bought - a similar allegation to that at the centre of the Goldman case.

Goldman was a big player in CDOs, but not the biggest. Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and UBS underwrote more such securities, according to Nomura. With elections around the corner in both the UK and Germany, trades by these firms would be an obvious target for scrutiny.

But the fallout could be much more widespread. Synthetic CDOs are potentially fertile territory for regulators, due to the tension between the long and short side of the trade and the potential conflicts for the structuring investment bank. If regulators look hard enough across the industry, it is surely probable that they could turn up evidence of disreputable activity given the sheer volumes involved. The question is precisely how hard the regulators wish to look. All investment banks had significant exposure to the CDO business. Perversely, that is also the one - awkward -consolation for the industry.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 20 2010 | 12:15 AM IST

Next Story