Adidas and Nike are among Western brands who have fallen foul of angry demands for better pay and welfare in China.
Hong Kong-listed Yue Yuen, which describes itself as the world's largest maker of branded footwear, faced as many as 36,000 workers calling for better benefits in April.
Also Read
Wages in the country's manufacturing sector were up by more than 16 per cent in the first nine months of 2013, according to Datastream, far faster than nominal gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 10 per cent. That suggests workers are often getting what they want. But activists shouldn't take all the credit.
One reason strikes work is political.
China's government doesn't want mass unrest, but it does want richer labour.
Early drafts of new regulation on labour disputes in Guangdong encourage collective negotiations over wages and benefits, with strikes tolerated if a company ignores invitations to negotiate.
Double-digit bumps in minimum wages set the pace. Local authorities urged Yue Yuen to face up to workers' pension and healthcare demands; the official All China Federation of Trade Unions played a significant role in protests against store closures by US supermarket group Walmart.
Fortunately, there's more to go around. China's industrial companies grew profits by 10 per cent in the first quarter of 2014, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. For foreign-invested companies growth was even faster, at 12.5 percent. Revenue might have slowed, and export growth is almost flat, but some costs of doing business could fall as rail and road networks expand. Financial reforms, including the Qianhai and Shanghai experiments with capital account convertibility, are designed to help shift profits across the border.
If manufacturers cared only about worker costs, they could go elsewhere. Yet a survey of Pearl River Delta manufacturers by Standard Chartered suggested only around 10 per cent consider leaving China the best response to rising wages. Well-established supply chains, relative political stability and growing port and air capacity make investing in local labour worthwhile. For now, strikes look more like evolution than revolution.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
