The anti-bribery framework in India
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA), and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), deal with corruption primarily in India. Some other anti-corruption laws are the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act, 2011; the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013; and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Central Vigilance Commission, Central Bureau of Investigation and Anti-Corruption Bureau are the main agencies responsible for investigating corruption charges against both central and state government departments, government companies, local government bodies and public servants under the PCA and IPC. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office, the investigating arm of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, probes fraud in companies.
The main focus of the anti-corruption laws in India is on the public sector. Further, they seek just to prosecute public officials accepting the bribe and not the person offering it. The bribe giver may be convicted, on rare occasions at that, at best for abetment. The PCA is proposed to be amended through the Prevention of Corruption Amendment Bill, 2013, pending in Parliament. Though the Bill seeks to bring in private entities and the bribe givers within the penal purview, it does not provide a comprehensive regulatory framework to deal with corruption.
The Mondelez case is the latest in a series of actions against companies operating in India. They include Walmart, Oracle and Diageo. Regardless of when the Bill becomes law, it is imperative that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies (especially the ones having a US/UK connection) take measures to avoid going the Mondelez way. Most multinational corporations have to adopt an anti-bribery policy and identify corrupt practices. The policy should distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable practices. For instance, greeting cards are deemed acceptable but gift vouchers may not pass muster. Managements and employees must be made aware of this.
A whistleblower protection mechanism, coupled with setting up a disciplinary process and periodic audit/monitoring of such acts, will usher in integrity in the organisation. While it is one thing to have policies and records in place, the challenge is implementation. With checks and balances, foreign companies operating in India will find it relatively easy to comply with the requirements of the FCPA and other international anti-corruption laws. (Sharanya G Ranga is a partner at Advaya Legal and Probal Bose is an associate)
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)