Switzerland’s banks have to hold extra capital — the “Swiss finish” — because they tower over their tiny country. If the recent recommendations of the UK’s Independent Commission on Banking are accepted, UK lenders will have a “British finish” for similar reasons. Euro zone banks should require extra capital, too, though not because they are huge compared to the size of the economy. Rather, it is because the region’s lenders of last resort mechanisms are dysfunctional. Think of that as justification for the round of capital-stuffing being prepared now.
Until recently, euro zone banks may have thought they would gain a competitive advantage over their British and Swiss rivals by having a thinner sliver of capital. But, as the sovereign debt crisis turns into a banking crisis — Dexia’s brush with disaster has provided the latest shock — politicians are coming to the conclusion that fatter loss-absorption buffers are needed. Without extra capital, it will be hard to restore confidence among depositors and providers of wholesale funds.
So far, there doesn’t seem to be a clear idea about how to do this. Indeed, there seems to be an attitude in some quarters that bigger cushions aren’t really needed on fundamental grounds; they are required just because the market is behaving irrationally. But, this misses the point. Investors are worried because the institutional arrangements for regulating and bailing out banks in the euro zone are untested and plagued with complexity.
The European Banking Authority, which co-ordinates national regulators, has been exposed as a paper tiger, thanks to its excessively soft stress tests. The European Central Bank, which provides liquidity in a crisis, has been slow to make long-term lending available — although it may change that stance on October 6. The European Systemic Risk Board, a new crisis management body grouping central banks and regulators, hasn’t yet done anything visible. And, what about politicians who would be required to sign the cheques for any bank bailouts? Well, they are endlessly squabbling.
In the given circumstances, it is rational for the markets to demand a euro zone finish. The sooner the policymakers give it, the smaller it will need to be.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
