The American people and the world were given an unsettling inkling of the future under Donald Trump at his first post-election press conference and the first since July 2016. Coming just hours after outgoing President Barack Obama’s virtuoso farewell speech in Chicago, recording a solid legacy of verifiable achievement, the shambolic affair at Trump Tower, New York, could not have been a starker indication of the style and substance – or the lack of it – of the upcoming presidency. With just a week to go before he takes the oath of the world’s most powerful office, Mr Trump was stuck in campaign mode — aggressive, weak on substantive agenda, prone to grandiose claims bordering on the delusional, and wholly untroubled by the need for consistency, veracity or, indeed, dignity.
The problems began with the lengthy and unconvincing explanation by his lawyer on the tricky issue of ring-fencing his business from conflict-of-interest issues. The plan centres on handing over management to his sons, employing an “ethics manager” to vet decisions, but is largely contingent on his resolution to resign from all positions and abstain from interference. Such abstinence may have been more credible had he subjected key companies to the transparency of market listing, and met a long-standing demand to release his tax returns, which he steadfastly declines to do. Meanwhile, he retreaded the old rhetoric. He talked of replacing Mr Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act with a “fantastic” plan that he nevertheless did not spell out — even as Republicans have begun to express doubts about having a workable replacement to minimise disruption once the law is repealed. The old favourite of building a wall on the Mexican border found mention with a variation that the Mexican government would reimburse the cost through some mysterious mechanism that did not involve “a payment”. Mr Trump also repeated his extravagant claims to bring back jobs by raising tariff walls on imports. He made characteristically excessive claims about the unprecedented greatness of his untested, mostly white, male Cabinet comprising businessmen and former generals.