Which Lulanomics?

Image
Martin Hutchinson
Last Updated : Feb 05 2013 | 11:56 PM IST

Brazil: Brazil’s new president, Dilma Rousseff, has promised to follow the policies of her predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. But it’s unclear whether she’s talking about Early Lula or Late Lula. For investors, the former would be preferable to the latter.

When Lula was elected in 2002, markets trembled, worrying that he would increase Brazilian public spending excessively, leading to default. However his first finance minister, Antonio Palocci, reassured markets, keeping tight control on spending. Lula’s main first-term initiative, costing about 0.5 percent of gross domestic product, was the Bolsa Familia system of transfer payments to poor families. This gave a stipend of 22 reais ($12) monthly per child attending school, to a maximum of three children, for families earning less than 140 reais per month. The United Nations attributes the program with helping to reduce Brazil’s GINI inequality index, on World Bank figures, from 59 in 2001 to 55 in 2008.

As Brazil’s economic position and credit rating improved after his 2006 re-election, Lula loosened controls on public finances, with a major surge in spending both directly and through state-controlled companies and the development bank BNDES. While Rousseff has pledged to keep Brazil’s primary surplus above 3.3 per cent of GDP, that figure will only be achieved in 2010 by counting a one-off transfer from Petrobras and by keeping much infrastructure spending off the books.

Since 2008, Lula has also fiddled with property rights, re-nationalising oil concessions and extracting large additional royalty payments from Petrobras in the large Tupi oil deposits. Investors widely attribute Petrobras’ huge investments in the low-margin, but high job creation, refining business to government pressure. Vale’s increase in steel production appears to have been similarly motivated by government interests.

Lula’s early policies stabilized the economy and made important gains against Brazil’s worryingly high inequality. Those policies, not the state aggrandisement and overspending of his latter years, are the ones Rousseff would be wise to emulate.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 03 2010 | 12:23 AM IST

Next Story