However, those who have already invested need not panic. According to financial planners, it makes sense to stay invested till the lock-in period of five years is over. You can stop paying the premium in the interim but the accumulated amount will only come to you after five years. Also, the accumulated amount will be added to your income and taxed, according to the bracket. “If the money put was linked to a goal, then take a decision accordingly or move out of the scheme and invest in equities,” says certified financial planner Gaurav Mashruwala.
In addition, if the premium is stopped in the interim, all the premiums paid till that time will go into the discontinued fund. And the discontinued fund will earn a meager 3.5 per cent on that accumulated premium, which will not be attractive as even the usual savings bank rate is four per cent and even six per cent in some banks.
The main problem with these products, according to Mashruwala, was that the product was not communicated properly to customers. "The catch was in understanding the 'highest NAV-guarantee', which the product offered."
These products were pitched in a way that they recorded gains only by investing in equities. However, an official from the industry said the product initially invested in equities to spike the NAV, then loaded the portfolio with debt to ensure that the NAV did not fall.
Arvind Rao, chief financial planner of Dreamz Infinite, says most insurers did invest much in equities. This is because, the fund managers wanted to book profits (by protecting the highest value of the fund achieved in a certain period) before the policy's tenure gets over."
Hence, most of these products give returns tilted towards debt. Highest NAV-guaranteed products are like unit-linked insurance products (Ulips) with a premium paying terms (PPTs) of five to eight years.
Another financial planner said if the returns are debt-oriented and limits the fund manager from taking advantage of the upsides in equities, then there is no point in locking funds in such a fund. One may be better off going by the book, which says keep insurance and investments separate. That is, by a pure protection cover which should be at least 10 times one's annual income, and invest through mutual funds or stocks for any equity exposure.
Additionally, these policies are expensive as one has to pay charges for premium allocation, policy administration, surrender charges and so on. Hence, weigh your options before you exit from such policies and calculated decisions.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)