CBI decides to wind up probe in DA case against Mayawati

SC on July 6, last year had quashed the nine-year-long disproportionate assets case against the BSP chief

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 08 2013 | 3:18 PM IST
CBI has decided to wind up its probe in the disproportionate assets case against BSP supremo Mayawati after receiving legal opinion on the Supreme Court orders on the issue.

CBI sources said the apex court had quashed the agency's FIR in connection with alleged disproportionate assets of the BSP leader last year but the matter was in a limbo after an intervention application was filed by a private person.

The Supreme Court had on August 8, this year dismissed the intervention application, paving the way for the closure of the DA case against Mayawati, they said.

Also Read

The sources said after getting a certified copy of the latest order, the agency had sought legal opinion on the orders of the apex court on the issue.

They said legal experts were of the view that the agency should close the probe in the case. The experts felt that if anyone wants a probe, he can approach an appropriate court to get a suitable order with which CBI would comply, they said.

On August 8, the apex court had dismissed a petition filed by Uttar Pradesh resident Kamlesh Verma who was an intervener in the case filed by Mayawati for quashing the DA case against her.

While reserving its verdict on May 1, the bench had said that the FIR in the DA case was quashed because CBI proceeded against her without properly understanding its orders which were confined to the Taj Corridor case.

However, it had said that the judgement had not taken away CBI's power to proceed against her in a separate DA case.

The Supreme Court had on July 6, last year quashed the nine-year-long disproportionate assets case against the BSP leader and had pulled up CBI for exceeding its jurisdiction by lodging an FIR against her without any direction from it.

The court had said the DA case against Mayawati was "unwarranted" and that the agency proceeded against her without properly understanding its orders which were confined to the Taj Corridor case relating to the release of Rs 17 crore by the UP government allegedly without sanction.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 08 2013 | 3:10 PM IST

Next Story