Centre's panel to see if AAP govt wasting resources on ads

Court was hearing four PILs, including one by Maken, seeking to restrain the AAP government from airing publicity campaign and advertisements

Ajay Maken
President of Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee, Ajay Maken addresses a press conference in Jalandhar. Photo: PTI
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 10 2016 | 9:47 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today asked a three-member committee appointed on the Supreme Court's direction to check violation of its guidelines with regard to content in government advertising, to examine the charge of wasteful expenditure on advertisements by the Delhi government.

A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra also asked the committee constituted by the Centre to decide in a time-bound manner Congress leader Ajay Maken's representation alleging that the Arvind Kejriwal government is issuing ads in violation of the guidelines.

"The committee will consider and hear both parties and pass the order," the bench said, adding that it will pass a detailed order indicating the time-frame.

The court was hearing four PILs, including one by Maken, seeking to restrain the AAP government from airing publicity campaign and advertisements allegedly glorifying Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) by "wasting public funds".

It asked the committee to decide the issue after Maken's counsel Aman Panwar told the court that only the state governments can appoint their own committee, whereas the advertisements of the Union territories will have to be regulated by the three-member committee of the central government.

Maken, chief of Congress' unit in Delhi, has also sought a direction to restrain the Delhi government from publishing the name of the Delhi Chief Minister in any of its current or future advertisements, that are allegedly in violation of the government Advertisement Guidelines, 2014.

Earlier, the AAP government had told the court that it had set up its own panel to regulate advertisements as per a recent Supreme Court order.

The submission had come in response to the contention made on behalf of the Congress leader that the AAP government was setting up its own panel in violation of the apex court directions.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 10 2016 | 8:07 PM IST

Next Story