“There is not even a single file that is pending before me. Only eight per cent of projects that need environment clearance come to MoEF. The rest are cleared by the respective states and regional offices. Hence, it is wrong to state that I was sitting on projects with huge investment figures. Moreover, environment impacts have to be given priority in this ministry, not investment figures,” she said.
Natarajan was criticised for holding up projects worth Rs 10 lakh crore and for being barring clearance of projects that had been given the green signal by the Cabinet Committee on Investments.
An environment ministry official, who agreed with her claim said, “A Forest Advisory Committee meeting that was held after she resigned, had to leave empty-handed as we had no projects to be cleared.”
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)