On August 8, the Ahmedabad crime branch had submitted a closure report in the case which meant that the investigating agency did not found evidence against the accused for which he or she could be prosecuted.
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate M H Patel on Friday accepted the closure report filed the investigating agency, Ahmedabad Crime Branch and directed that all proceeding initiated against Modi for alleged violation of polls code be dropped in absence of any proof.
The magistrate also accepted the report of the investigating agency that said that no offence was committed by Modi by addressing the media on April 30, after he voted at a polling booth in Ranip area of Ahmedabad. He also agreed with the finding of the probe officer that Modi had not violated poll code by holding his party symbol ‘lotus’ while showing his inked finger, as it was outside the prescribed limit from the polling booth.
The magistrate in its order accepted the crime branch’s version that Modi took selfie with BJP’s symbol ‘lotus’, but it was a white lotus. “The tone-tenor and language used by Modi in the media interaction and the display of white lotus symbol by him do not come within the ambit of display of election matter as envisaged under section 126(1)A and 126(1)B of the Representation of People Act,” the court said.
On April 30 while polling for Lok Sabha elections were on in Gujarat Modi had addressed a meeting after casting his vote in Ranip Area.
During the meeting Modi was seen holding his party symbol ‘lotus’ while showing his inked finger. He also clicked a ‘selfie’ and posted it on his Twitter account.
Following this an FIR was filed against Modi and others on directions of the Election Commission of India for violation of provisions of Sections 126 (1) (a) and 126 (1) (b) of Representation of People (RP) Act 1951, for holding public meeting, under IPC section 188, for violating election notification and CrPC section 144 which prohibits more than four people from gathering for a specific purpose.
As per the section 126 (1) (a) of RP Act, there is a prohibition of public meetings during period of 48 hours ending with hour fixed for conclusion of poll.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)