Insisting there was no rule that says a party cannot get LoP status unless it has 10 per cent of the total strength of the 543-member Lok Sabha, the former parliamentary affairs minister said, though a Speaker is generally neutral, when it comes to dealing with parliamentary processes, it could be different in a contentious situation.
“We know the Speaker is from the BJP... Speaker is appointed by a political party... when it is a contentious situation... It (the decision on LoP) will be flavoured by the BJP and Modi,” Nath told Karan Thapar on Nothing but the truth programme on Headlines Today.
He was replying to a question on why he was raising fingers on the intention of the government in this matter when the decision on LoP will be taken by the Speaker. While hastening to add that what he said “Does not mean that she is acting on the behest of somebody”, Nath insisted, “But there is always a flavour”.
He also said if the Speaker rules against the Congress on the LoP issue, it would be right and proper for the Congress to go to the court. “Certainly, we must. It should be one of the options,” he said.
At the same time, he said Congress won’t retaliate or be obstructive in Parliament simply because the LoP status was denied to it, as party president Sonia Gandhi would not like the party to be retaliatory on the matter.
Nath also vehemently countered the contention that Rahul Gandhi was reluctant to take responsibility and cited instances from the past 30 years when the Leader of the House of a party and its President were two different persons.
Responding to questions about party veteran A K Antony's remarks that the proximity of the Congress to minority communities had led people to doubt its secularism, Nath said if there was any such perception, “Congress must correct it.”
“If Congress' version of secularism is perceived as a slant towards Muslims, Congress needs to portray it correctly... we need to stand up and say that we are not slanting,” he said. According to Nath, when Congress talks about secularism, it is known and minorities believe it.
"Perhaps Antonyji wanted to say secularism alone cannot be the only slogan of Congress," he said, adding the party has always been standing for secularism and does not need to rub it in all the time.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)