1984 riots: Court reserves order afresh on transfer pleas

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 02 2015 | 3:55 PM IST
A Delhi court has reserved its order for February 12 on pleas of three accused who, along with Congress leader Sajjan Kumar are facing trial in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, seeking transfer of the case on the ground of jurisdiction.
District Judge Rakesh Siddhartha, who recently took over the charge, heard the arguments afresh on the applications and fixed the matter for pronouncing order on it.
"Arguments heard afresh on application moved on behalf of accused persons for transfer of this case. To come up for orders on February 12, 2015," the court said.
Earlier, the order on the pleas was reserved for January 31 by District Judge Talwant Singh, who got transfered to another court before pronouncing the verdict.
Sajjan Kumar, Brahmanand Gupta, Peeriya and Ved Prakash are facing trial on charges of murder and rioting in a case of killing of Surjit Singh in Sultanpuri area of West Delhi.
The pleas were moved by Gupta, Peeriya and Ved Prakash for transfer of the case from Karkardooma district court in East Delhi to Rohini district court on ground of jurisdiction.
The counsel for Gupta and Peeriya had argued the case needed to be transferred to its respective district Rohini for want of jurisdiction as the alleged occurrence pertained to Sultanpuri area and not the jurisdiction of this court.
Ved Prakash's advocate had argued that the court should implement the Delhi High Court's 2013 order asking sessions judges to transfer the cases as per their jurisdiction.
CBI prosecutor D P Singh, however, had opposed the pleas saying as per the provisions of CrPC, district judge does not have the power to transfer a case from his division to another and this power lies only with the high court.
He had sought dismissal of the pleas contending that when the HC's 2013 order was passed, this case was already pending but the accused did not raise this issue at that time.
"This is blatantly an attempt for forum shopping," he had argued.
The court in July 2010 had framed various charges, including murder and rioting, against Kumar, Gupta, Peeriya, Khushal Singh and Ved Prakash in connection with killing of a man in Sultanpuri in the riots that had occurred after the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984. Accused Khushal Singh has since died.
The trial court had also framed charges for the offence of spreading enmity between two communities against the accused in the case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 02 2015 | 3:55 PM IST

Next Story