2G PMLA case: Not going to stay ongoing trial, clarifies SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 18 2014 | 8:37 PM IST
The Supreme Court today made it clear that it was not going to stay the trial in the money laundering case arising out of the 2G scam and posted the plea of accused persons for quashing of charges against them on November 26.
"There will be no stay of the trial," a bench headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu said at the outset when the counsel for accused persons sought to make submissions.
During the brief hearing, the counsel questioned the framing of charges by the trial court by taking into account the statements recorded by Enforcement Directorate officials under section 50 of Prevention of the Money Laundering Act.
They submitted that statements recorded by the ED under Section 50 were inadmissible in evidence as they are equivalent to statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC, the use of which is prohibited under Section 162 CrPC.
However, the bench, also comprising Justices M B Lokur and A K Sikri, before posting the matter for November 26, said, "Once we say no stay of trial, we cannot say don't look to a particular part of evidence."
Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Harish Salve, appearing for some high-profile accused, clarified that they were not asking for stay of the trial but were not clear whether the appeal against the order of trial court framing charges in the money laundering case would lie in the Delhi High Court or the Supreme Court.
The apex court, which is monitoring the probe in the 2G spectrum scam, had in its earlier order, said that appeal against the special court's order would not be heard by any other court.
In a batch of petitions, the accused persons have moved the Supreme Court seeking setting aside of a lower court order framing charges against him.
A special court had on October 31 ordered framing of charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against 19 persons, including former telecom minister A Raja, DMK supremo M Karunanidhi's daughter Kanimozhi and wife Dayalu Ammal and Swan Telecom promotor Shahid Balwa.
It had said there was prima facie evidence that they played roles in "parking" of illegal gratification of Rs 200 crore in Kalaignar TV.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 18 2014 | 8:37 PM IST

Next Story