Seeking that its petition against the FIR lodged by the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) of the Delhi government in 2014 be allowed, the company told Justice A K Chawla that the ACB did not have the jurisdiction to probe such matters.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for RIL, also referred to the August 4, 2016 judgement of a division bench of the high hourt which had held that powers of the ACB were limited to probing graft cases in various departments under the administrative authority of the lieutenant governor (LG) and not extending to central government employees.
The Delhi government's additional standing counsel Gautam Narayan told the court that they have already challenged the August 4, 2016 verdict has already been challenged in the Supreme Court.
He said the apex court has given the assurance that it would soon constitute a Constitution bench to decide its appeal challenging the high court verdict holding the LG as administrative head of the national capital territory.
Narayan submitted till that time the matter be adjourned.
It said no prejudice would be caused if RIL and the Centre's pleas against the FIR were kept pending till the apex court decided the case.
Taking note of the submission, the court listed the matter for hearing on November 22.
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal during his first stint had asked the ACB to lodge an FIR in the matter.
Besides the company, erstwhile UPA ministers M Veerappa Moily and Murli Deora (since dead), RIL's chairman Mukesh Ambani, former director general of hydrocarbons V K Sibal and other unidentified persons were named in the FIR lodged by the ACB.
The FIR was lodged by the ACB on a complaint sent to the chief minister by former cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian, former secretary E A S Sarma, former navy chief R H Tahiliani and advocate Kamini Jaiswal.
The then UPA-II government had also moved the court for quashing of the FIR, saying the ACB of the Delhi government had "no powers or jurisdiction to investigate" complaints against the Union government's decision to fix prices of natural gas.
The FIR was lodged under sections for cheating and criminal conspiracy of the IPC and under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
