Vishwas, a member of party's top decision making body, the Political Affairs Committee, said there has been a "communication gap" between the party, its volunteers and voters, adding that the AAP is getting "Congressionised" to an extent.
The poet-turned-politician also differed with party convenor and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal over asking proof for surgical strike after the Uri terror attack last year.
He said during instances like terror attacks and surgical strikes, political parties should work shoulder-to-shoulder without seeing who is at the helm of affairs.
"Should we run a campaign to change electoral process. Problems in the EVMs are a part of elections. It be should be questioned," Kumar said in an interview to Aaj Tak.
The AAP leader said with the poll results it has also become "obvious" that people did not vote for the AAP.
"By and large, we could not convey our point to people and there was a big communication gap. We could not convince people about work done by the Delhi government did," the AAP leader said.
Vishwas is not the only AAP leader to differ with the party leadership's view on EVMs. Delhi Law Minister Kapil Mishra and party MP from Sangrur Bhagwant Mann also hold a contrarian viewpoint.
Kejriwal has been alleging tampering of EVMs behind party's defeat in MCD polls and Punjab state elections. Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Labour Minister Gopal Rai have also said voting machines were "rigged".
"We could not convince people about the good work done by the party. That connect is missing and the party needs to revive it. We need to generate that confidence in people and enthuse our volunteers," the AAP leader said.
He said, while the current BJP has become 80 per cent Congressioned because of its "kitchen cabinet, dynastic politics and appeasement of majority and minority as per convenience," Vishwas said the same is happening with the AAP to an extent.
He said the controversy after the surgical strike could have been avoided. The BJP had accused Kejriwal of asking for proof for the strikes.
"This (the controversy) was not important and could have been avoided. When our armed forces are fighting a battle against terrorism, crossing the LoC to conduct surgical strike, at that time one should back the person who is at the helm of affairs.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
