ABVP seeks action against AMU prof for 'anti-Modi' remarks

Image
Press Trust of India Aligarh
Last Updated : Mar 23 2017 | 5:49 PM IST
The ABVP staged a protest here demanding action against an Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) professor for allegedly making anti-Modi statements and fuelling resentment against the present government's Kashmir policies.
The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) activists burnt an effigy of AMU Vice Chancellor Lt Gen (retd) Zameer Uddin Shah yesterday and issued a "72-hour ultimatum" to the university authorities for taking punitive action against the professor, failing which they threatened to launch an agitation.
The RSS-backed students' body has demanded the district administration's intervention in the matter if the university authorities do not take any action, ABVP spokesman Dhiraj Choudhary said today.
They also accused the AMU authorities of "shielding" Prof Majid Khan of the department of Islamic Studies instead of taking action on the basis of the complaint against him by his own students.
When contacted, AMU Vice Chancellor told PTI, "We have zero tolerance for any sort of anti-national activity and the allegation that we are trying to shield anyone is totally baseless. There is no evidence whatsoever against the Professor."
Refuting the ABVP's allegation, a senior AMU official said a two-member inquiry panel which had been instituted against Prof Khan following a complaint in this regard by some students, has exonerated him of any anti-national utterance during discussion in the classroom.
The official said the matter was linked to the internal power politics in the department.
Vice Chancellor Shah had on Tuesday said the the inquiry committee had gone into the allegations made by 30 students in a written complaint to him in March 2016 and "exonerated Prof Majid Khan of any anti-national utterances in front of his students".
Khan was, however, cautioned not to discuss extraneous and politically sensitive issues in the classroom, he said.
Meanwhile, all efforts to reach Professor Khan proved futile.
According to some of his associates, he had been advised not to exacerbate the controversy by issuing any statements in this matter.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 23 2017 | 5:49 PM IST

Next Story