“The noodle samples of Knorr Soupy, Horlicks Foodles and Ching's Hot Garlic Instant were collected from a city mall in May for testing and its report was received about a fortnight ago," food safety officer of Barabanki district, Sanjay Singh, said.
The samples were sent to government Food Analysis Lab in Lucknow where it was found that "total ash of the tastemaker exceeds the maximum prescribed limits ... hence the samples are sub-standard," Singh said.
Against the prescribed limit of 1 per cent, ash content was found to be 1.83 per cent in Ching's noodles, while in Foodles it was 2.37 per cent and in Soupy noodles it was 1.89 per cent, he claimed.
Notices were sent to all the three companies a week ago giving them a month's time to make an appeal, he said.
When asked for comment on the issue, a GSK Consumer Healthcare spokesperson said: "We manufacture Foodles as per product approvals received by us from FSSAI and manufacturing licences received by our third party manufacturer from the Authorities. Foodles available in the market have been manufactured in accordance with this product approvals."
A query sent to Hindustan Unilever, which sells Knorr range of noodles, remained unanswered.
Capital Food, which markets Ching's Hot Garlic noodles, could not be reached for comment.
Responding to a question, Singh said the report did not mention the health hazards caused by ash content higher than prescribed limits.
Interestingly, the UP Food Safety Department in May last year had found high lead content and presence of taste enhancer monosodium glutamate (MSG) in samples of Maggi noodles.
Later in June, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) banned Maggi noodles, alleging that the instant noodles were "unsafe and hazardous" due to higher than permissible lead content and presence of MSG.
Nestle had then pulled the product off shelves. The instant noodle brand made a comeback in November after passing tests at three government labs, after which the Bombay High Court removed the ban.
(REOPENS DCM117)
When contacted, an HUL company spokesperson said: "With reference to the analysis reports of the UP Food Safety Authority, we wish to clarify that the conclusion that the product is 'sub-standard' is incorrect. We will be making appropriate representation with the regulator.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)