Describing the "flaws" in the bill as being against the Constitution and fundamental rights, AIMPLB spokesperson Maulana Syed Khaleel-ur-Rahman Sajjad Nomani alleged that the proposed bill bans the institution of talaq itself.
"It is generally publicised that this bill is presented to stop triple talaq. But, the fact is, if you read the bill, it is to ban the entire institution of talaq," Nomani told reporters here on the eve of the Board's three-day 26th plenary session.
The AIMPLB also claimed efforts are being made to enact a "very wrong law".
The spokesperson, however, said the "board was not opposed to the bill, but wanted the flaws removed".
The board requested all the opposition parties to consider whether the bill can be passed in its present form, he said.
The triple talaq bill has already been passed in the Lok Sabha, but it is yet to get a nod in the Rajya Sabha, where the BJP-led NDA lacks majority.
The bill also enables any person from anywhere to complain against a Muslim man vis-a-vis divorce, he claimed.
"Even if the wife says he (her husband) has not given divorce and that it was a wrong report (on the matter), police will say you have to prove that in court and that we have to arrest. This is a strange legislation. That means, the truth is, it makes us feel ashamed not just as a Muslim but as a citizen of this country," Nomani said.
"I challenge categorically there is no such law in the whole world. This is very shameful type of drafting. An effort was being made to make a very wrong type of law. There are other such flaws. The Muslim Personal Law Board's stand is to get those flaws removed," Nomani said.
The board would exercise all the democratic options regarding the bill, he said.
The board sought an appointment with the prime minister after the bill came into public domain, but no response was received from the PMO, Nomani alleged.
Replying to a query on 'nikahnama' (marriage contract), he said that the issue would be taken up if any member raises it with the permission of the Chair.
To a query on the Ayodhya issue, he said no proposal has been received officially or unofficially by the AIMPLB.
The spokesperson said it was contempt of court to talk about the outcome of the Ayodhya issue as it is sub-judice.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
