The earlier PIL, filed by one Umakanta Pattanayak of Kendrapara district, was listed for hearing by a division bench on the day. But the matter could not be taken up since the lawyers gathered in a condolence meeting following the death of a member of the bar.
The High Court had on last Wednesday issued notices directing the state government and Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) to respond to the PIL filed by Pattanayak. The Court had ordered the State Chief Secretary, the Law Secretary and the Chief Administrator of SJTA to respond within two weeks.
The petitioner said the incident that happened on June 16 in the Temple was in violation of thousand years of customs and usages followed in the temple.
The "irregularities" have hurt the religious sentiments of the devotees of the Lord Jagannath across the world, the petition said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
