The petition by former bureaucrat and social activist Harsh Mander was filed in a pending identical matter involving NGOs, Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Common Cause.
When the NGOs' plea came up for hearing, a bench of Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Sunil Gaur asked them to give details of the DRI enquiry against alleged over-invoicing of equipment and fuel imported for power plants and tagged the fresh petition along with it.
However, Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain said the pleas would obstruct the ongoing probe.
The DRI said it would be appealing against its adjudicating authority's decision giving a clean chit to the Adani group in connection with one of the show cause notices issued to the company for alleged over-pricing of equipment.
No one appeared for the two group companies as they have not been made parties in the petition, which has incorporated the Centre, the DRI and the CBI as the respondents.
"This simple step would go a long way in curbing this menace. It is pertinent to mention here that the DRI itself has issued a general alert finding 40 companies to be indulging in rampant over-invoicing," the plea filed through advocate Vaibhav Srivastava said.
During the hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the two NGOs, alleged that over-pricing was also a cause for the rising number of non performing assets (NPAs) of the banks.
He claimed that on the basis of the over-invoicing, the companies were "lifting huge loans from public sector banks" and, through this modus operandi, "siphoning off money".
Apart from this, these power companies charged a higher tariff from consumers on the ground of the over-priced equipment and fuel, he contended, adding that "they are defrauding consumers by saddling them with higher power tariffs."
The bench, however, said it first wanted to understand the issue and asked the NGOs to give a note indicating the content of the various show cause notices issued to the two groups by DRI as well as the status of investigation and adjudication by the agency in each case.
They have also alleged that the power firms belonging to the two groups were allegedly inflating the value of imports for their power plants to siphon money abroad and avail higher power rate compensation.
"The modus operandi is identical in all these cases. The coal or power equipment, even though (these are) shipped directly to India, but its invoicing is routed through a different company incorporated abroad which is directly owned and controlled by the promoters of the project in India," the PIL has alleged.
However, the CBI apparently closed the PE without registering an FIR during the tenure of then CBI Director Ranjit Sinha, the PIL has alleged.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
