Senior counsel for Chelladurai contended that the petitioner was not present at the spot during the demolition.
"The petitioner owned a building adjacent to the Palace. The contractor engaged by him to demolish his building had inadvertently demolished a small portion, which housed the office of the PWD Periyar-Vaigai Basin Circle," he said.
The petitioner had given an undertaking to the PWD to renovate the damaged portion of the Palace. Chelladurai had also submitted before the court that he was willing to restore the damaged portion and pleaded for anticipatory bail, the counsels said.
The heritage building, constructed in 1689, suffered damage while demolishing an adjacent building near the famous Sri Meenakshi Temple on July 26, over which Chelladurai claims ownership.
Six persons, including son and son-in-law of Chellathurai, had already been arrested in connection with the incident.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
