The court heard thatin an email exchangedin 2009 between ANZ senior executive Chris Page and former CEO Mike Smith, Page used several"derogatory terms" to describe Pankaj and Radhika Oswal, media reports said.
"In essence we are dealing with two very unsavoury characters. We are dealing with Indians with no moral compass and an Indian women who is every bit as devious as PO (Pankaj Oswal)" Page wrote to Smith.
"It is no more than less than racial bigotry," Bannon said, adding that it implied the couple "had character flaws that were essentially Indian".
"To think he could send it to the CEO of the bank without the fear of rebuke betrayed what was indeed the true culture of what was acceptable for the CEO of the bank," Bannon said.
Bannon told the ongoing trial that instead of admonishing Page,Smith's response showed he held similar beliefs to Page.
"Chris Well done. I guess we just need to keep the pressure on. What a bunch," Smith wrote in his response toPage.
The couple alleges that their stake was sold for USD 560 million which was far less than they say it was worth. They are seeking damages of between 1.5 billion dollars and 2.5 billion dollars over the sale.
Meanwhile,ANZ Bank has accused the coupleof siphoning off 150 million dollars of company funds for personal use.
TheOswals have alsodisputeda 186 million dollar tax bill issued by the Australian Taxation Office.
