Appeals court says American can't sue FBI over abuse claims

Image
AP Washington
Last Updated : Oct 23 2015 | 11:02 PM IST
A U.S. Citizen who claims American officials falsely imprisoned and tortured him for several months in Africa can't sue the FBI agents involved because the conduct took place overseas during a terrorism investigation, a federal appeals court ruled today.
The 2-1 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit acknowledged that Amir Meshal's allegations of abuse were "quite troubling," but said he is without recourse to pursue claims that agents violated his constitutional rights.
"Matters touching on national security and foreign policy fall within an area of executive action where courts hesitate to intrude absent congressional authorization," Judge Janice Rogers Brown said in upholding a lower court decision that threw out Meshal's case last year.
Meshal, a New Jersey resident, said he traveled to Mogadishu, Somalia, in 2006 to "broaden his understanding of Islam."
After violence erupted, he and other civilians fled to neighboring Kenya, where he was later arrested by Kenyan authorities and turned over to the FBI.
The lawsuit, which the American Civil Liberties Union filed on Meshal's behalf, claims U.S. Officials sent him back to Somalia and eventually to Ethiopia, where he was imprisoned in secret for several months.
He says FBI agents accused him of receiving training from al-Qaida and subjected him to harsh interrogations while denying him access to a lawyer, his family or anyone else.
He was released in May 2007 with no explanation, according to the lawsuit.
While law enforcement officials can be sued for violating a person's constitutional rights, Brown said courts have been hesitant to allow such lawsuits in cases "involving the military, national security, or intelligence."
Those concerns are heightened when the conduct takes place outside the United States, she said.
Brown said the fact that Meshal is a U.S. Citizen does not outweigh the court's reluctance to interfere with matters of national security.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh agreed with Brown, but wrote separately to stress that it's up to Congress, not the courts, to decide whether U.S. Officials can be sued for conduct in foreign countries "in connection with the war against al Qaeda and other radical Islamic terrorist organizations."
In dissent, Judge Nina Pillard said the government had not backed up its claims that allowing the lawsuit would undercut national security and diplomatic relations.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 23 2015 | 11:02 PM IST

Next Story