Appointment of judges: opinions of govts to be considered, says CJI

Says 'Alternate Dispute Resolution' mechanism should not be taken only as mode to reduce pendency of cases

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133683230/stock-photo-scales-of-justice-gavel-and-books.html" target="_blank">Gavel</a> image via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Aug 20 2013 | 3:08 PM IST
Chief Justice of India P Sathasivam today said the Central and state governments were free to express their opinions and objections, which would be taken into account, while appointing judges for the Supreme Court and various High Courts in the country.

Speaking at the inauguration of Alternative Disputes Resolution Centre here, he said, though judges were not elected members by the people but lawyers and judges were ultimately accountable to the people.

Emphasizing the need for the judiciary to give priority to cases relating to women, children and socially backward communities and minorities, he said he had written to Chief Justices of all High Courts in this regard, after assuming office.

Observing that Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism should not be taken as only a mode to reduce pendency of cases, the CJI said that it also allowed litigants to reduce misunderstandings among themselves.

Stressing the need of judges to be equipped with knowledge in latest technologies, he said it would be required to have both national and international perspective to decide cases in future.

He said the administrative control of High Courts over subordinate judiciary was comprehensive and complete and added that being in the apex of judicial administration of the state, Chief Justice and other High Court judges have a shared responsibility to access performance of subordinate judges periodically.

There was a steady decline in the reputation of judiciary in the country, he observed.

Though judiciary was India's most respected institution, unfortunately, there was a steady decline in the reputation of the judiciary as well as the legal profession, he said.

He said the judiciary, unlike other institutions in the democratic setup, thrived only on trust and confidence reposed by people and the virtuous image of this institution in the eyes of public was imperative for dispensing justice.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 20 2013 | 3:01 PM IST

Next Story