Khan's counsel had moved an application in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (Jodhpur District) on Tuesday stating that the licence of the arms used in the said incident had not expired then.
He had produced a notice issued by the then DCP and DM of Mumbai on September 29, 1999, which had asked Khan why his licence should not be cancelled.
However, the Public Prosecutor N K Sankhla protested the plea saying the notice was meant for suspension of the licence and did not pertain to the expiry of the licence, which had expired long before the incident took place.
Admitting the arguments of the prosecution, Judge Anupama Bijlani rejected Khan's petition to summon the officers as witness.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
