The Bombay High Court today criticised the Maharashtra government for defying its orders and provisions of the Disaster Management Act by not setting up separate disaster management authorities in Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban districts.
The court had previously ordered the government to set up separate disaster management authorities in Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban districts, as mandated by the act, by January 31. However, the government set up a common authority.
Justices A S Oka and Riyaz Chagla were annoyed by this.
"Why this anxiety and insistence to go contrary to the law and our orders? If the state government is inconvenienced with our orders or the Act, then challenge it," Justice Oka said.
The government has committed a wilful breach of the court's orders, the division bench said.
When the matter came up for hearing this morning, the bench issued a contempt of court notice to Medha Gadgil, additional chief secretary, Maharashtra, over the matter.
However, during the afternoon session, government pleader Abhinandan Vagyani submitted a letter from Gadgil assuring the court that separate authorities will be set up within 15 days.
"We are accepting Gadgil's letter and recalling our order issuing the contempt notice," Justice Oka said.
The bench said if the authorities are not constituted by May 4, it would considered it an "aggravated" contempt.
The high court was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Sanjay Lakhe Patil of the NGO Marathwada Anushesh Nirmulan Aani Vikas Manch, raising the issue of water scarcity faced by farmers in parts of Maharashtra every year.
The petition sought a direction to the government to implement the Disaster Management Act, 2005, and also sought to know the measures taken by the government for drought mitigation.
The Act, a Central legislation, provides a mechanism for effective management of disasters, both natural and man-made.
"The Act is crystal clear. It is the state government's obligation to establish a Disaster Management Authority for each and every district," the court said.
The state government's stand that one authority was enough for Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban districts is disastrous, Justice Oka said.
The bench posted the matter for next hearing on May 4.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
