British court rules against Iran in tank payment dispute

Image
AFP London
Last Updated : Jul 26 2019 | 8:25 PM IST

A UK court has ruled in London's favour in a long-standing financial dispute with Iran that has wider political ramifications for Britain's increasingly strained relationship with the Islamic republic.

The case revolves a payment of 650 million pounds made by Iran in the 1970s to buy 1,500 Chieftain tanks from Britain and repair 250 more.

The deal was blocked after the 1979 Islamic Revolution deposed the Western-backed Shah.

Britain kept the paid portion of the contract. Just under 400 million pounds (USD 500 million, 450 million euros) are now being kept in a frozen British bank account.

Sending the money to Tehran is further complicated by EU and US sanctions linked to Iran's nuclear programme.

A judge with the UK High Court ruled on Wednesday that Britain did not owe Iran interest payments of more than 20 million pounds that had accumulated on the sum over 10 years.

Justice Stephen Phillips cited a precedent case that found claims made by any "Iranian person, entity or body, including the Iranian government" were invalid in commercial disputes because of the Western sanctions.

The Iranian claim was made jointly by its defence ministry and armed forces.

New UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said while he was still foreign minister in 2018 that making the payment could help pave the way for the released from a Tehran jail of British-Iranian national Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe.

The 41-year-old's 2016 arrest and conviction on sedition charges she has protested with a series of hunger strikes has further complicated London's historically difficult ties with Tehran.

These were inflamed further by Iran's detention of a British-flagged tanker on July 19 in the Strait of Hormuz.

The seizure came in apparent retaliation for the UK authorities' arrest of an Iranian tanker off Gibraltar on July 4 on suspicion it was shipping oil to Syria in apparent breach of EU sanctions.

Iran has not publicly commented on Wednesday's court ruling.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 26 2019 | 8:25 PM IST

Next Story