Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut told PTI that the party is concerned about whether attempts are on to "weaken and destabilize" the Prime Minister by making such statements given the fact that he had assured he would protect Maharashtra's integrity as long as he is in Delhi.
"We suspect that people from the Prime Minister's own party are trying to make him unstable by raking up the issue. Shiv Sena is unfazed. It is not afraid of a fight. It is ready for the battle for the cause of Maharashtra", said Raut, whose party is a coalition partner of the BJP both at the Centre and in the state.
"Maharashtra has been created following a struggle and sacrifice by 105 martyrs," he said, insisting "Maharashtra is united, it will remain united."
Replying to a question, he said statements favouring division of Maharashtra could be an attempt aimed at creating unrest in the otherwise peaceful state. "It could be an attempt to divert the attention of the people from the burning problems of drought, scarcity of water, suicide by farmers and rising unemployment", he said.
In an apparent dig at RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, he said RSS now issues clarifications to the statements of even its chief. The jibe was in obvious reference to RSS clarifying Bhagwat's remarks on review of reservation policy which had created a controversy during the Bihar polls.
Raut's remarks came close on the heels of Vaidya's statement favouring splitting Maharashtra into four states. Vaidya had said, "One state should be Mumbai along with Konkan, Western Maharashtra can be a second state, Vidarbha the third state and Marathwada including north Maharashtra the fourth state called Devgiri.
Earlier this week, Maharashtra Advocate General Shreehari Aney was forced to resign for his remark favouring a separate Marathwada state which led to an uproar in both Houses with the Opposition and even ruling ally Shiv Sena seeking his ouster.
Aney had said at a programme where relief was distributed among families of farmers who committed suicide that Marathwada had suffered more injustice than Vidarbha, and called for a movement for creation of a separate state. A few months ago, he had sparked a similar row by calling for a referendum on a separate Vidarabha state.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
