Can't act as CBI's post office: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 28 2017 | 8:40 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today said it would not act as a "post office" for the CBI and directed an NGO, which was seeking a probe into alleged corruption by BSNL officials, to place evidence before the investigating agency.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar said that under the law, an individual has every right to file a complaint and even produce evidence before the agency, which has to look into it.
"We (the court) are not going to be the post office for the CBI. Please place the relevant evidence before the CBI. It shall be open to the agency to look into it and proceed in accordance with law," the bench observed.
The court's observation came during the hearing of a plea by NGO Telecom Watchdog, which sought investigation into a matter in which BSNL officials allegedly caused loss of about Rs 1,000 crore to the exchequer by releasing unauthorised payment to the subsidiary of a Chinese firm by fabricating documents.
The BSNL has refuted the allegations.
The NGO had filed an application to submit additional information in the matter.
In its reply, the CBI told the court that preliminary enquiry (PE) was underway.
"We are looking into the allegation and we will file our status report in a sealed cover before the next date of hearing," CBI counsel Sanjeev Bhandari submitted.
To this, the bench said it does not want to monitor the probe into the matter but the same should be time bound.
It fixed the matter for March 6 next year, by when the CBI has to submit its report.
The NGO has alleged that officials of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) had connived with M/s ZTE Telecom India Pvt Ltd, a Chinese contractor, and forged official records of BSNL so that "undue payments" of about Rs 1,000 crore could be released to the firm.
The NGO has claimed that they had filed a complaint on the issue on March 11 last year before CBI but the agency has not taken any action.
The plea has sought a direction to CBI to investigate the complaint in a time-bound manner.
It alleged that official documents were fabricated to release payment of 95.10 per cent "illegitimately" to M/s ZTE.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 28 2017 | 8:40 PM IST

Next Story