The court said that CBI had concealed documents regarding two previous TRAI recommendations on the issue by initially dubbing it as unrelied upon and that it was done to "distract" the court's attention at the time of taking cognisance of the charge sheet.
"I find myself in agreement with the defence counsel that TRAI recommendations were already there and DoT was not required to ask for fresh recommendations," Special CBI Judge O P Saini said while discharging ex-telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh and the three telecom firms in the case.
The court's observations assume significance as CBI, in its charge sheet, had alleged that before passing January 31, 2002 order regarding allocation of additional spectrum, DoT was required to obtain recommendations of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) about quantum of additional spectrum to existing operators as well as the charges to be levied.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
