CBI court adjourns hearing in illegal telephone case to Feb 5

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 03 2018 | 11:25 PM IST
A special court today adjourned hearing of the "illegal" telephone exchange case against former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran and his brother Kalanithi Maran to February 5.
Arguing on discharge pleas filed by the brothers, their counsel Kabil Sibal contended that the case was foisted on them.
The counsel submitted that the Central Bureau of Investigation had no basic technical understanding with regard to the telephone connections.
Sibal argued that there was not even a "whisper" about the involvement of Kalanithi Maran in the entire 3,000 page charge sheet and no witness even spoke about his involvement in the case.
"Except he was the MD of Sun Group, Kalanithi Maran has nothing in it," Sibal and another counsel ARL Sundarresan submitted before the CBI Court today.
"The allegation that there were 700 telephone lines was wrong. As then telecom minister only 10 lines were provided to Dayanidhi Maran's residence, originally at Gopalapuram, later in the Boat Club area."
"The CBI had failed to understand the latest technology. If they have understood, they would not have pursued this case," they said.
Recording the submissions, special CBI court judge S Natarajan posted further hearing to February 5.
According to the CBI, Dayanidhi Maran, during the check period of June 2004 to December 2006, when he was the Union minister for communication and information technology, misused his office and installed a private telephone exchange at his residences in Chennai and utilised the facility for business transactions involving Sun Network.
It said he had caused a loss of Rs 1.78 crore to the exchequer.
More than 700 telecom lines were installed at their residences in Boat Club and Gopalapuram here, the agency charged.
Among the accused were former BSNL general manager K Brahmnathan, former deputy general manager M P Velusamy, Dayanidhi Maran's private secretary Gauthaman, and Sun TV officials.
Besides the Maran brothers, Sibal and A R L Sundresan also represented the other accused in the case.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 03 2018 | 11:25 PM IST

Next Story